Jean Luc Nancy writes: “Art called contemporary is not simply what can be dated to today. It is called contemporary because it does not inherit any form or reference. It cannot be the art of the sacred nor that of glory, nor that of a supposed nature or destiny of peoples. It inherits only the enigma brought by this word – ART – which was invented when all the figures of a possible “representation” began to be subtracted. It is contemporary with its own wandering and the always uncertain and trembling birth of forms that would be typical of a failed encounter of all the properties received”.
We think that contemporary time is necessarily discontinuous, the contemporary artist adds, divides, takes away, replaces his own time, “feels” it in the intimate, relates it to other times, sinks into the past and tends towards the future. “In contemporary times everything has yet to happen. And together it has already happened” as Marco Belpoliti acutely reflects. And what happens is the present, our present.
If then modern physics –especially quantum physics– tends to exclude the existence of Time, and tells us that the moment that comes is not equal to the moment that precedes it, and that there is no linearity but only concentric motion of atoms moving in space, and that sensation is only subjective and only determined by motion, then our research has some basis.
The constant refractions in classical work, whether literary, poetic, or visual, therefore become, for us linguistic practice, constant in aesthetic research, in the metamorphosis of forms and signs, in the repetition of history; a wandering and uncertain investigation, Paul Celan would have written with a stammer.
Like the Time of the infinitely great and the infinitely small
The Great Theatre of the World, to be built in collaboration with the Pilotta Monumental Complex, and the staging of Pedro Calderón de La Barca's La vida es sueño, first in the form of a contemporary auto sacramental and then in the staging of the drama in all the spaces of the complex, constitute our three-year proposal.
The baroque philosophical-theological drama perfectly represents the thematic question that headlines the entire project: the imminent past. The Farnese monument between historical period and contemporaneity, the dramaturgy that isolates life and dreams in the same space-time (and vice versa), and the relationship between urban space, collective enjoyment, and active memory configure a hypothetical framework of synthesis and design for the capital of the future. The perception of individual time through multiple artistic forms (installation in space, video-projected images, live performances, musical dramaturgy between Baroque, modern and contemporary) favors that common time – together with the common space, the city – necessary to outline community identity and new perspectives.
The Pilotta Monumental Complex can represent that common space that hosts the different times of collective and individual history, as an inclusive hub of the different souls of the Polis -. Students from the Toschi art high school and other schools in the city, the Arrigo Boito Conservatory and various choirs, the University (the University of Parma is a supporting member of the Lenz Foundation), and students from the Cinema District will be able to actively participate in the project, through practical workshops, as documentary filmmakers for the entire experience. Each stage of set-up will make use of advanced technological systems that will document its work in progress and, in particular for site-specific, the most advanced video and sound representation techniques will be employed.